what's new in the news today | Myanmar Rohingya Today News

 What will Bangladesh get in the discussion?

what's new in the news today | Myanmar Rohingya Today News

Myanmar state councilor Aung San Suu Kyi, Minister of Myanmar, will be considered for the visit of Ch Tint Sauer, the visit of more than five lakh Rohingya refugees fleeing Myanmar. In the face of international criticism, the Myanmar government has been more flexible than ever before, encouraging this tour to be considered as its indication. The Myanmar government tried to give the idea of displaced and emigrant people very few in the beginning and tried to give an idea that the military operation was not responsible for it. But it is not acceptable to anyone, its indirect recognition matched the tour. Now the government of Myanmar has virtually accepted the government of Myanmar that it is a problem, which will not be solved by the army officer in Naypyidaw, the speech given in Suu Kyi in English.Myanmar leaders have been facing the bulletin Balu and the supporters of Russia, China and India will have the support of the international forum on the grounds that this issue will disappear. It is also positively positive that no representative of Bangladesh has to appear in Nipomo. But what has happened outside this visible positive side of the tour is surprising and worrying; In the long term, it is not possible to blame Bangladesh for not being positive.Bangladesh and Myanmar agreed on the visit of Suu Kyi, Minister of State for Tourism, that a working group will be set up to take back Myanmar citizens and this working group will take steps to revive the refugees. I have put the word 'Refugees' in quotes; Because no party has ever described the emigrants as 'refugees'. This is not said by quoting two sides at any news; Because, in the official language of Bangladesh, they are 'infiltrators'; On the other hand, Myanmar has not yet clarified that they are Myanmar citizens. Army officials from Aung San Suu Kyi have said that they are willing to take back the Myanmar citizens by verifying them.We are aware of the importance of this, we also know its real problems. But we are no longer aware of the working group. There is no reason to think that all will be addressed in a meeting. There is no history of diplomacy in solving a problem in a meeting. But why is the responsibility of giving information about this matter to Bangladesh alone and why the minister of Myanmar did not face journalists in Dhaka, we can definitely ask for it? Myanmar's sincerity was proved when the minister of Myanmar was present during the six-minute press briefing of Foreign Minister Mahmud Ali. Since it is a government-organized and open tour, the opportunity for creating trust was created as a representative of two parties, in a brief press conference.There is no need to convince anyone of Bangladesh that the issue of confidence in Myanmar's Rohingya talks is important. In the recent past, I did not say about Myanmar's behavior, in the past, there has been a two-point agreement between Rohingya and Myanmar deliberately behaved negatively in implementing the 1991-92 contract. That is why three lakh Myanmar citizens are staying in Bangladesh before 5 million people of this clique. Not only that, now the initiative taken by Myanmar is the reason for the skepticism of the international pressure that is not an attempt to eradicate.Worse yet, according to a media release, the rehabilitation will be based on the 1992 bilateral agreement.
The questioning of the effectiveness of this agreement is clear in Bangladesh's experience. Furthermore, on September 28 in the UN Security Council, Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said that the Myanmar government is committed to the structure of the joint statement signed between Bangladesh and Myanmar Foreign Ministers in 1992. Gutters said he could start from this deal, but 'in the present situation it is not enough'.As a result, the unity of 1992 is used as a framework, it is convenient for Myanmar; That is why it was given importance in the statement given by the State Council of Myanmar on Tuesday. In view of this statement by the UN Secretary-General, it can be said that it may obstruct the way the United Nations intervenes. Despite this observation of the UN Secretary-General, why Bangladesh has considered the basis of it and has effectively made Myanmar the way to a convenient position to discuss, it is astonishing.In this context, it should be clearly stated that responding to any kind of effort is necessary for the immediate resolution of the humanitarian crisis facing Bangladesh now. It is normal and appropriate response. I am not in favor of closing bilateral negotiations. Especially, in that case, China, Russia, and India will remain active against the strict action of international action against Myanmar, and Bangladesh has not been able to form a major diplomatic alliance against it. But despite the fact that Myanmar's bilateral resolution proposal is not too optimistic, it is worth considering.The main cause of Myanmar's bilateral initiative is international pressure. If that ends, then there will be deficit in Myanmar's enthusiasm. Myanmar has not taken any action so far, which has been identified by the international community and has not even shown its response. The United Nations Secretary-General told three steps, firstly to stop the military operation immediately; Removal of barriers to humanitarian aid inside Myanmar and safe, self-motivated, respected